Skip to main content

Dashboard for managers

Updated over a year ago

In the dashboard, you will find access to several views representing the survey results.

Further explanations and interpretation notes are included in the PDF version, which you are welcome to download for your records.

Key Performance Indicators

Health-related productivity losses & Work-related well-being

Health-related productivity losses

The following three parameters are aggregated here:

  • Absenteeism, i.e. days on which employees were unable to work due to illness.

  • Presenteeism, i.e. days on which employees were ill but still worked - although they were only able to work to a limited extent.

  • Ability to work on the remaining days, i.e. how employees assess their current physical and mental ability to successfully complete their work tasks.

A higher number of days of absenteeism and presenteeism combined with a less favorable assessment of employees' ability to work will result in higher health-related productivity losses!

Work-related well-being

Work-related well-being measures the overlap between well-being (mental health) and commitment (identification) and highlights an important individual resource of the employees.

Evaluation units with a high level of well-being generally show the best performance and productivity, they are more agile, more open to new ideas, more resilient and have fewer health-related productivity losses.

Participants

You will get an overview of the participation rates broken down into gender distribution, type of activity and age distribution.

This data forms the foundation of the benchmark: A suitable reference group is composed according percentages distribution of the three parameters shown (gender, type of work, age).

Stress - radar chart

This view shows the comparison of mean values for the subjective health perception.

    • Evaluation unit: dark line

    • Benchmark: red line

    The results are displayed in comparison to a group with the same demographic structure (modulated by age, gender, type of work) outside of your company/department.

Stress - distribution

This view shows the distribution of the data from highly positive to highly negative deviation in comparison to the benchmark data.

The different colors from light green (1) to dark red (5) indicate a ‘rated’ risk area.
Please note that it does not correspond to the category marked in the questionnaire!

Risk areas (yellow and red) are those answers which are very different from the benchmark mean value (individual mean values!)

The last column shows the cumulative percentage share in the risk area

Values above 30 % should be defined as target areas.

Stressors and Resources - radar chart

This view shows the mean value comparison of cultural and organisational stressors and Resources.

  • Evaluation unit: dark line

  • Benchmark: red line

    The results are displayed in comparison to a group with the same demographic structure (modulated by age, gender, type of work) outside of your company/department.

Stressors and Resources - distribution

This view shows the distribution / deviation of the data in the benchmark comparison

The colors 1 (light green) to 5 (dark red) indicate a ‘rated’ risk area.
Please not, that it does not correspond to the category marked in the questionnaire!

Risk areas (yellow and red) are those answers which are very different from the benchmark mean value (individual mean values!)

The last column shows the cumulative percentage share in the risk area

Values above 30 % should be defined as target areas.

Factors for improving KPIs

This view shows a summarized representation factors which are are a strength and which are a challenge for your evaluation unit.

The factors that represent a strength or a challenge in relation to the benchmark are shown here.

The colors of the arrows indicate the significance of the differences and are referred to as effect sizes.
The colors yellow and red are crucial for your interpretation and indicate a clearly visible call to action.

KPIs: Relationship and Comparison

This view provides you a graphical comparison of the relationship between the two KPIs within your organization.

Your selected evaluation unit is shown in white and the company average is shown with a company icon.

The size of the circles corresponds to the number of participations in the respective evaluation unit.

The further down your blue circle appears on the right, the more favorable the result.

Filter results

Filter the results by gender, age, and job position.

If the function has been enabled by your company, you can also filter by hierarchical level.

Select "APPLY" .

Download a results report

Here you will receive your results report including detailed explanations, question overview, etc., as a PDF version. The number of downloads is NOT limited!

💡 If you have applied a filter, the results report will be generated with the applied filter.

Please note that in this case, the report will only contain a subset of the data. If you wish to see all data in the PDF report, reset the filter and download the results report again.

Search for other evaluation units

If you have access to several evaluation units, you can search directly for them to display the results.

Are you curious about the results?

Your employees are too!

Take sufficient time for the analysis of your departmental data, use the PDF results report for detailed insights into the questions and respective answers of your employees.

It's important to maintain and expand strengths. For factors that deviate significantly from the benchmark, consider together with your team how to turn them into strengths. "What is within your sphere of influence? What would be a good initial step?"

Also, make use of the guiding questions on page 8 of your results report, which will assist you in this process.

Wishing you much success and thank you for your trust, from the HealthVision team.


Take the interactive Dashboard tour

Did this answer your question?